Approved - 7 to 0.

1032 Belford Rezone

Case: RZN-2020-434
Consider a request by Maverick Place LLC to rezone 0.144 acres from C-1 (Light Commercial) to R-O (Residential Office).

Videos

Staff Presentation

Files

Development Application ( 1.65 MB )
Staff Report ( 0.18 MB )
Maps and Exhibits ( 0.7 MB )
Proposed Zoning Ordinance ( 0.01 MB )
Decision Making Criteria

Per Section 21.01.140 of the Zoning and Development Code, the Planning Commission and City Council shall base their decisions in consideration of the extent to which the applicant demonstrates the following criteria have been met:

(1)    Subsequent events have invalidated the original premises and findings; and/or

(2)    The character and/or condition of the area has changed such that the amendment is consistent with the Plan; and/or

(3)    Public and community facilities are adequate to serve the type and scope of land use proposed; and/or

(4)    An inadequate supply of suitably designated land is available in the community, as defined by the presiding body, to accommodate the proposed land use; and/or

(5)    The community or area, as defined by the presiding body, will derive benefits from the proposed amendment.

Comments & Feedback

Comments
 
This case is closed, online commenting is no longer available.
The Planning board may feel that this rezoning request is in line of their plans for GJ, but to start this rezoning right in the middle of the block, just doesn't seem right to me. As you say, the rebuild will be "in line" with the existing architecture in this area, I don't believe that will be the case. The example of my opinion is the monstrosity built on the 10th block of Colorado Ave. What part of that 3.5 story condo is consistent to the neighborhood? As the owner of 1005 Belford, we worked closely with the planning board to build an auxiliary unit that truly was consistent with the neighborhood. This rezoning will not be consistent, in my opinion. I am opposed to this rezoning.
October 26, 2020, 10:14 AM
Linda Lynch
3 / 10 Planning Commissioners have viewed this comment
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Your Question has been submitted.