Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting
5 items
∙
Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 5:30pm
Approved
∙ Approved 7 to 0.
∙ Agenda item 2 of 5
∙ Case: VAC-2021-392
Tonto Lane Right-of-Way Vacation
Consider a request by Kraig Andrews to vacate right-of-way of Tonto Lane between 2632 and 2635 Cottonwood Drive.
Staff Presentation
Files
Development Application
( 1.75 MB )
Staff Report
( 0.08 MB )
Location Map
( 0.51 MB )
Draft Ordinance
( 0.28 MB )
Decision Criteria
Each decision maker will follow the criteria below when voting on this item.
Per Section 21.02.100 of the Zoning and Development Code, before an easement or street right-of-way vacation is approved, the following determinations shall be made:
(1) The Comprehensive Plan, Grand Junction Circulation Plan and other adopted plans and policies of the City;
(2) No parcel shall be landlocked as a result of the vacation;
(3) Access to any parcel shall not be restricted to the point where access is unreasonable, economically prohibitive, or reduces or devalues any property affected by the proposed vacation;
(4) There shall be no adverse impacts on the health, safety, and/or welfare of the general community, and the quality of public facilities and services provided to any parcel of land shall not be reduced (e.g., police/fire protection and utility services);
(5) The provision of adequate public facilities and services shall not be inhibited to any property as required in Chapter 21.06 GJMC; and
(6) The proposal shall provide benefits to the City such as reduced maintenance requirements, improved traffic circulation, etc.
(1) The Comprehensive Plan, Grand Junction Circulation Plan and other adopted plans and policies of the City;
(2) No parcel shall be landlocked as a result of the vacation;
(3) Access to any parcel shall not be restricted to the point where access is unreasonable, economically prohibitive, or reduces or devalues any property affected by the proposed vacation;
(4) There shall be no adverse impacts on the health, safety, and/or welfare of the general community, and the quality of public facilities and services provided to any parcel of land shall not be reduced (e.g., police/fire protection and utility services);
(5) The provision of adequate public facilities and services shall not be inhibited to any property as required in Chapter 21.06 GJMC; and
(6) The proposal shall provide benefits to the City such as reduced maintenance requirements, improved traffic circulation, etc.
Public Comments
Commenting on this item has ended.
Online comments closed at 5:30 PM MDT 8/23/21.
No comments were received.
Next Up
Reece Annexation